What the CJEU has actually decided in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Espanola de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González, No. C-131/12: An analysis of how this decision fits in with previous CJEU case law and how much is left for national courts to elaborate
Identifieur interne : 000274 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000273; suivant : 000275What the CJEU has actually decided in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Espanola de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González, No. C-131/12: An analysis of how this decision fits in with previous CJEU case law and how much is left for national courts to elaborate
Auteurs : Patrick Van Eecke [Belgique] ; Anthony Cornette [Belgique]Source :
- Computer law review international [ 1610-7608 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
- Wicri :
- topic : Décision, Jugement, Information, Législation.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
On 13 May 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its decision in the case Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (CRi 2014, pp. 77). Google Spain SL is a milestone judgment on the balance between privacy and the right of the public to access information. The judgment raises a number of important questions, including the territorial scope of the privacy legislation, the way of assessing which information must be considered to be "inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to those purposes and in the light of the time that has elapsed", and the "opt-out" processing by search engines (including of special categories of data) which now seems to have been legitimised by the CJEU. After a brief introduction (I.), the article first lays out the material that was in front of the CJEU for evaluation (II.). In a second step the actual decisions on the 9 merits are assessed and interpreted against previous CJEU case law (III.), before the remaining open questions are summarised in a conclusion (IV.).
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000006
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: 000015
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Curation: 000129
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Checkpoint: 000001
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000274
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000274
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What the CJEU has actually decided in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Espanola de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González, No. C-131/12: An analysis of how this decision fits in with previous CJEU case law and how much is left for national courts to elaborate</title><author><name sortKey="Van Eecke, Patrick" sort="Van Eecke, Patrick" uniqKey="Van Eecke P" first="Patrick" last="Van Eecke">Patrick Van Eecke</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Antwerp</s1><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Anvers</settlement><region type="district" nuts="2">Province d'Anvers</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université d'Anvers</orgName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>DLA Piper</s1><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country><wicri:noRegion>DLA Piper</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cornette, Anthony" sort="Cornette, Anthony" uniqKey="Cornette A" first="Anthony" last="Cornette">Anthony Cornette</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>DLA Piper</s1><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country><wicri:noRegion>DLA Piper</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">14-0207319</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 14-0207319 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:14-0207319</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000006</idno><idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0207319 INIST</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000015</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000129</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000001</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1610-7608:2014:Van Eecke P:what:the:cjeu</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000274</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000274</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000274</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">What the CJEU has actually decided in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Espanola de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González, No. C-131/12: An analysis of how this decision fits in with previous CJEU case law and how much is left for national courts to elaborate</title><author><name sortKey="Van Eecke, Patrick" sort="Van Eecke, Patrick" uniqKey="Van Eecke P" first="Patrick" last="Van Eecke">Patrick Van Eecke</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Antwerp</s1><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Anvers</settlement><region type="district" nuts="2">Province d'Anvers</region></placeName><orgName type="university">Université d'Anvers</orgName></affiliation><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>DLA Piper</s1><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country><wicri:noRegion>DLA Piper</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cornette, Anthony" sort="Cornette, Anthony" uniqKey="Cornette A" first="Anthony" last="Cornette">Anthony Cornette</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>DLA Piper</s1><s3>BEL</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14><country>Belgique</country><wicri:noRegion>DLA Piper</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Computer law review international</title><idno type="ISSN">1610-7608</idno><imprint><date when="2014">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Computer law review international</title><idno type="ISSN">1610-7608</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Court</term><term>Data</term><term>Decision</term><term>European Union</term><term>Evaluation</term><term>Information</term><term>Judgment</term><term>Justice</term><term>Legislation</term><term>Private life</term><term>Relation</term><term>Relevance</term><term>Right</term><term>Search engine</term><term>Trial</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Moteur recherche</term><term>Décision</term><term>Droit</term><term>Tribunal</term><term>Justice</term><term>Union européenne</term><term>Procès</term><term>Jugement</term><term>Vie privée</term><term>Information</term><term>Législation</term><term>Evaluation</term><term>Pertinence</term><term>Relation</term><term>Donnée</term><term>Google</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Décision</term><term>Jugement</term><term>Information</term><term>Législation</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">On 13 May 2014 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its decision in the case Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González (CRi 2014, pp. 77). Google Spain SL is a milestone judgment on the balance between privacy and the right of the public to access information. The judgment raises a number of important questions, including the territorial scope of the privacy legislation, the way of assessing which information must be considered to be "inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant, or excessive in relation to those purposes and in the light of the time that has elapsed", and the "opt-out" processing by search engines (including of special categories of data) which now seems to have been legitimised by the CJEU. After a brief introduction (I.), the article first lays out the material that was in front of the CJEU for evaluation (II.). In a second step the actual decisions on the 9 merits are assessed and interpreted against previous CJEU case law (III.), before the remaining open questions are summarised in a conclusion (IV.).</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Belgique</li></country><region><li>Province d'Anvers</li></region><settlement><li>Anvers</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université d'Anvers</li></orgName></list><tree><country name="Belgique"><region name="Province d'Anvers"><name sortKey="Van Eecke, Patrick" sort="Van Eecke, Patrick" uniqKey="Van Eecke P" first="Patrick" last="Van Eecke">Patrick Van Eecke</name></region><name sortKey="Cornette, Anthony" sort="Cornette, Anthony" uniqKey="Cornette A" first="Anthony" last="Cornette">Anthony Cornette</name><name sortKey="Van Eecke, Patrick" sort="Van Eecke, Patrick" uniqKey="Van Eecke P" first="Patrick" last="Van Eecke">Patrick Van Eecke</name></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Belgique/explor/OpenAccessBelV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000274 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000274 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Belgique
|area= OpenAccessBelV2
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:14-0207319
|texte= What the CJEU has actually decided in Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v. Agencia Espanola de Protección de Datos, Mario Costeja González, No. C-131/12: An analysis of how this decision fits in with previous CJEU case law and how much is left for national courts to elaborate
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |  |